Home / Panels
|
Panel Number |
Panel Title | Organizers |
| P1 : Panel 1 (Wednesday, 16:00 - 17:45) |
The Rise and Fall of Product Line Architectures | Isabel John, Christa Schwanninger, Eduardo Almeida |
| P2 : Panel 2 (Thursday, 15:30 - 17:30) |
Product Line Success in Cultural Diversity | Klaus Schmid |
| P3 : Panel 3 (Friday, 13:30 - 15:00) |
The Many Paths to Quality Core Assets | John D. McGregor |
P1 : The Rise and Fall of Product Line Architectures
Although architecture has been recognized as the central
artifact in product line engineering since many years, it doesn't
seem to be THE hot topic anymore. There was no session on
architecture at last SPLC, there was only one tutorial mentioning
architecture in the title. So, is the concept of a product line
architecture dead? Has there really been a "fall" of product line
architectures? Or is it just normal to have one, so we don't have to
talk about it anymore? In this panel we want to have a look at these
questions: Product line architectures might be irrelevant in the era
of agile processes and open source, but if they are not we want to
bring this topic to life again for the SPL community.
This panel addresses questions around architecture like: How do you
think a good product line architecture should look like? How much
up-front design do we need for a product line architecture? What are
hot research topics in product line architecture?
The panel is organized as a goldfish bowl, where the panelists form
a circle in the middle of the audience and panelists change during
the panel, so everybody can become a panelist in this session.
Panel Organizers
Isabel John, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Germany
Christa Schwanninger, Siemens AG, Germany
Eduardo Almeida, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) and RiSE, Brazil
Panelists
Paul Clements, Charles W. Krueger, John McGregor, Dirk Muthig, David Weiss
Download protocol of the goldfish panel
Top Page
P2 : Product Line Success in Cultural Diversity
Over and over again practitioners report that soft factors like organization,
people issues (champions) and communication are key to the success of a product line
effort.
But typical forms of communication, the behavior and work practices of people depend
also on the cultural context: so, how do we need to adapt product line practices for different
cultural backgrounds? What are cultural “traps” to watch out for?
Are there universal guidelines for product line engineering soft factors? And if so, which are they?
In this open discussion round, some experts will provide a first account of their
experiences in diverse cultural settings and then we will open the floor to draw upon the large
combined experience of the audience.
Panel Organizers
Klaus Schmid, University of Hildesheim, Germany
Panelists
Linda Northrop, Isabel John, Kyo Kang, Sooyong Park
Download slide sets of the cultural diversity panel:
Penel introduction (Klaus Schmid)
Position (Linda Northrop)
Position (Isabel John)
Position (Kyo Kang)
Position (Sooyong Park)
(Two more slide sets will be
added.)
Top Page
P3: The Many Paths to Quality Core Assets
Can all of the different approaches to software product line operation lead to quality core assets? Is there value in quality? Should discussions
of quality in a product line address separate quality factors for core assets and product-specific components? How do core assets reach
maturity most rapidly? How are quality requirements different in a software product line?
This panel session will present diverse views on how to achieve quality products in a software product line organization. We will
aggressively seek audience participation in an effort to answer these questions with actual experience.
Panel Organizers
John D. McGregor,
Clemson University, USA
Panelists
Danilo Beuche, Pure-systems
Yaser Ghanam, University of Calgary
John D. McGregor, Clemson University/SEI
Kentaro Yoshimura, Hitachi
Top Page